« an entre to opera | Main | What's in a name? »
Sunday
Jun282009

balancing form and function

I have not finished a design course.. in fact, I have never even started one, however more and more design is becoming a passion of mine and I like to think that my current vocation (which I now term as software design) means I was in design all along.

 

And perhaps I was

 

Today I came across, in a  magazine from the financial review, a glossy review of a bunch of products primarily aimed at the office market. Beautifully 'designed' items of form and function, in so far as they do something and look nice. One caught my eye particularly, a rock covered in orange calfskin leather masquarading as a paperweight.

 

I mean, seriously. It was Louis Sullivan who coined the phrase 'form ever follows function' ... often taken to mean that both are important but ask any user of a product.. if something doesn't do what it was supposed to do then how nice it looks counts for nothing. I like the way Chris Farley put it in Tommy Boy..(paraphrased) ... I could take a dump in a box and put a guaranteed sticker on it and it will still be a guaranteed piece of shit

 

Ok, so back to the rock. Today's question (recurring theme in the blog btw, I've been told I jump into solution mode to quickly) is have we lost the balance between function and form in the current world of product design?# ... and I ask this question across the many modes of design

 

I heard a prognosis of apple's design being 'good design is when there is nothing left to take away' .. in reference to the simplicity of the ipod. From my reading of it the form part of that equation is maintaining the aesthetics WHILE stripping back that which is not required to achieve the function. Anything else is art for arts sake*.

 

 

I'm pretty sure the rock could do without the leather.

 

 

*Before I get a rise out of all this, I'm a big fan of art for arts sake.. but not when it's passed off as 'design'.

# I plan to do a lot more writing about this topic but happy to admit I'm not anywhere near qualified to have .. well, a qualified opinion on the topic. This is merely an opening salvo, shot in part to get some input from you as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

It depends what the purpose of said leather rock was? was it to keep paper from blowing away, or incite a smile, or invoke a sense of achievement, or boost self-esteem?
You can't just presume that the functional is only the physical or rational - good design can go a lot further in speaking to the aesthetes in all of us, and thereby fulfilling a highly useful function of stopping us from being cavemen.

June 29, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHM

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>